Transcript for contextual inquiry
We did a live contextual inquiry for www.e-thaksalawa.moe.gov.lk by interviewing a user. Our user was a good internet
and a computer user. But this was the first time of our user using the website.
We asked the questions that we had prepared from the model
questionnaire from the user and recorded the facial expressions, reactions and screen capture
of the usage,etc.
We have written the timestamps of the video with the corresponding
function if you want to further refer the place.
Accessing
the website
(00:11)
Task: selecting the language preference so that you can proceed to the
site in your preferred language.
Reaction: user
easily found the way to select the language preference. But was quite
frustrated with the loading times.
You can see our user waiting for almost a
minute to access the website, She said that this quite unacceptable.
Registering
processes
(05:06)
Task: registering as a student in a government school.
Reaction: easily
found the place to register and had little trouble registering, but also found
that you need a special code (School Census No) to complete the registration
which we don’t know, if it is distributed among the students it is acceptable,
but if the students don’t know this code, they will simply not be able to
register.
Task: registering as a student or a teacher in pirivenas.
Reaction: easily
found the place to register and had little trouble registering, but the problem
seemed to remain about the special code.
Task: registering as a student or a teacher in private schools.
Reaction: again
easily found the place to register and had little trouble registering, but the
problem seemed to remain about the special code.
Finding
Help
(06:28)
Task: finding help for students.
Reaction:
the location for help was quite easily found by the user.
Task: finding help for teachers.
Reaction:
this was also found quite easily by the user.
Finding
Past Papers
(08:46)
Task: finding model papers for A/Ls.
Reaction:
it took some time but the user finally found
it
after some time.
Task: finding past papers for primary classes.
Reaction:
it took some time but the user finally found
it
after some time.
Task: finding ordinary level past papers.
Reaction:
it took some time but the user finally found
it
after some time.
User mentioned as this is one of the most critical part of the website,
past papers should be moved to a more convenient location and grouped by the
level(primary,A/Ls,O/Ls).
Finding
Description
(12:36)
Task: finding the description of the site.
Reaction:
was able to find the description quite easily.
Library
related content (14:47)
Task: finding the e-library to view.
Reaction: User
was able to find the e – library but was unsatisfied with the content that was
provided.
Task: finding the thesaurus to find meanings.
Reaction: User
was not able to find the thesaurus at all, this was because it was named “artha
koshaya”
Even
in the English language, even after we told that to the user and she went there
, the user was completely unsatisfied as the thesaurus could only find meanings
if you typed in Sinhalese.
Task: finding biographies.
Reaction: User
was not able to find this one also, after we directed the user to the
particular location , user complained that the content was not translated into
english .
Finding
Lessons (15:28)
Task: finding science lessons for grade 6.
Reaction: User
was able to find the specified lessons but complained about the font color.
Entertainment
Related (16:00)
Task: finding children’s songs.
Reaction: User
was able to find this without any trouble.
FAQ (16:47)
Task: contact ministry of education for further inquiries.
Reaction: User
was able to find this without any trouble.
Then we asked the
following questions from the user,
1. What do you think
about the load times?
User replied that the some pages loaded
all right but the home page load time was unacceptable
2. What is your opinion
about the tasks?
User said that some of the tasks given were easy to do but
some were quite hard because of the poor language support the website provided.
3. How do you describe
your appeal about the site?
User replied that the site was somewhat
ok,but it could certainly be improved.
4. Which of these
features did you find most helpful?
User liked the grade wise grouped
material system and the register function as it was extremely easy to use, but
noted that only if the special code is well distributed.
5. Were you able to find
what you were looking for?
Again user had mixed feelings as she
was sometimes able to find what she looked for and sometimes couldn’t.
6. How would you rate
your experience on a scale of 1 to 10?
User rated the website with a 6.5 out
of 10.
7. Which parts did you
find less appealing/helpful?
User didn’t like the font of the lesson
content pages and noted about the correct language transitions that the website
should undergo through to be more apprehensible.
8. How would you think
those parts should be improved?
User said that some pages could be
improved by changing the font color, and the site should have proper language translation
so that the different users of different language can understand the website
easily.
No comments:
Post a Comment